Switchboards, PMS, and AMS sit at the centre of the vessel’s electrical architecture. Generator load sharing, fault discrimination, blackout recovery, alarm hierarchy, and operator visibility all depend on how these systems interact with each other. In practice, modification of one system almost always triggers an electrical engineering review of the others. Protection settings require recoordination when PMS logic changes, while switchboard modifications often affect alarm mapping, monitoring functions, and commissioning sequences across the wider electrical system.
Modern vessel retrofit projects increasingly combine switchboard and automation modernisation with future-ready electrical architecture planning. Operators are preparing fleets for shore power integration, hybridisation, BESS capability, DP2 extension, VFD integration, increased hotel load, and future decarbonisation requirements without requiring secondary rework later in the vessel lifecycle.
Future-ready marine grid modernisation typically includes engineering review of generator configuration, switchboard topology, protection coordination, PMS logic, AMS architecture, operational redundancy philosophy, load profile, and fault discrimination. Modern retrofit projects increasingly combine switchboard engineering, numerical relay protection, PMS integration, AMS architecture, and operational power management into one coordinated electrical engineering scope.
Coordinated switchboard, PMS, and AMS retrofit projects require careful engineering review across protection systems, automation logic, operational redundancy, Class compliance, and future integration capability. Our retrofit approach combines electrical engineering, power system integration, commissioning, and Class approval into one structured modernisation programme.
The process begins with technical review of the vessel’s existing switchboard architecture, PMS and AMS configuration, generator arrangement, protection philosophy, blackout recovery logic, operational load profile, existing Class findings, future upgrade requirements, and planned drydock schedule. This stage determines the technical and commercial viability of the retrofit scope.
Modernisation projects typically require updated protection studies, relay coordination review, fault level calculations, discrimination analysis, and blackout recovery assessment to ensure safe and reliable operation across the vessel power system.
Engineering scope may include switchboard modification, numerical relay integration, PMS redesign, AMS modernisation, IEC 61850 integration, automation upgrades, and preparation for future loads such as OPS, BESS, or DP2 extension.
Retrofit execution includes equipment installation, cable routing, switchboard integration, automation implementation, testing, and commissioning coordination structured to minimise operational downtime during the drydock window.
Upgrades are commonly evaluated for:
Feasibility studies typically review existing switchboard architecture, PMS and AMS configuration, protection philosophy, operational load profile, blackout recovery capability, Class findings, and future upgrade requirements to define the most suitable retrofit pathway.
Not always. Many projects can be completed as drop-in PMS upgrades while retaining parts of the existing switchboard infrastructure. However, ageing equipment, protection limitations, or future integration requirements may also justify partial or full switchboard modernisation.
Yes. Depending on vessel condition and operational requirements, existing AMS platforms may be upgraded, expanded, or integrated into a wider switchboard and PMS upgrade project.
We begin with a review of your vessel’s single-line diagram, switchboard configuration, PMS architecture, operational profile, and planned drydock schedule to identify the minimum retrofit scope required for operational reliability and future upgrade readiness. No commitment required. We provide an indicative retrofit scope, Class pathway, and integration strategy within 10 working days.
We can support with:
